RESUMEN
Objective: The objective of this article is to reinterpret metaphysical concepts found in chiropractic historic teachings by comparing these to the philosophical system of Baruch Spinoza. Discussion: Universal intelligence and innate intelligence are components of the historic and traditional philosophy of chiropractic. These concepts have offered a unique clinical perspective at the cost of committing to an a priori assumption that some see as untenable. The meaning of universal and innate intelligence may be reinterpreted through an understanding of life and health as offered by the conatus doctrine of Baruch Spinoza. The conatus doctrine defines within a formal system the striving and endurance of living beings to remain in unique forms. The reinterpretation offered in this article provides a rationally defensible concept closely tied to contemporary definitions of vitalism, which see life as potentiality striving against inertia and entropy. In its striving, life manifests itself by originating meaning out of information. Conclusion: Though the product of early-modern rationalism, Spinoza's conatus doctrine offers a contemporary interpretation of an aspect of living beings congruent with established notions within the philosophy of chiropractic. Concepts in Spinoza's work that concern substance and monism offer clarifying perspectives on concepts in the philosophy of chiropractic that may help resolve conflicts concerning spiritualism and naturalism.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this article are to describe the development of vitalism from its earliest Hellenistic form to that of a contemporary vitalism ethos and to propose the importance of vitalism in the philosophy of chiropractic and the chiropractic health care paradigm. DISCUSSION: A review of the history of vitalism is offered to clarify the use of the term within the chiropractic literature and to provide a defensible position for vitalism as a foundation for future research in the philosophy of chiropractic. The founder of chiropractic, Daniel David Palmer, drew heavily from spiritualism and vitalism in his construction of early chiropractic philosophy. As chiropractic practice and philosophy have evolved, that vitalistic foundation has become a polemic used by factions within the profession, resulting in political challenges. The controversy within chiropractic mirrors similar debates within academic philosophy regarding vitalism. The philosophy of vitalism has developed beyond its classical constructs, emerging as an ethos amenable to informing research within clinical applications and a perspective capable of informing the identity of chiropractic. CONCLUSION: Exploring the broad historical context of vitalism may allow for an understanding of the plurality of vitalist ideas and a clarification of the concept within chiropractic literature. Adopting vitalism within the philosophy of chiropractic as an ethos based on the work of Georges Canguilhem provides a view of life as fundamentally original, adaptable, and unpredictable, and therefore not sufficiently understood in purely reductionist terms.
